|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Virtual HyperVM Panel [message #67359 is a reply to message #67358] |
Mon, 08 June 2009 06:38   |
|
| dbmv wrote on Mon, 08 June 2009 06:31 | | arthurthornton wrote on Fri, 05 June 2009 15:43 | Very nice. I am currently working on a custom Kloxo frontend.
I thought I was the only one looking at this type of thing, but I must say you have finished a very difficult task.
|
Hoping that security is no longer an issue, where are you at with this? With a custom front-end, we could possibly firewall access to all of Kloxo/HyperVM (with josh's module) to only our client area IP.
|
Unfortunately, I am not anywhere near done with it. I am not even sure I will be able to go forward with it because I don't know how long LxLabs can survive under their dead weight.
But I will most likely be working on this, though there is no definitive timeline or deadline. The one great thing is that it would eliminate most of the vulnerabilities due to extreme checking of data before sending anything to Kloxo.
My Site
|
|
|
| Re: Virtual HyperVM Panel [message #67361 is a reply to message #67359] |
Mon, 08 June 2009 07:16   |
dbmv  Messages: 305 Registered: October 2008 |
Senior Member |
|
|
| arthurthornton wrote on Mon, 08 June 2009 06:38 | | dbmv wrote on Mon, 08 June 2009 06:31 | | arthurthornton wrote on Fri, 05 June 2009 15:43 | Very nice. I am currently working on a custom Kloxo frontend.
I thought I was the only one looking at this type of thing, but I must say you have finished a very difficult task.
|
Hoping that security is no longer an issue, where are you at with this? With a custom front-end, we could possibly firewall access to all of Kloxo/HyperVM (with josh's module) to only our client area IP.
|
Unfortunately, I am not anywhere near done with it. I am not even sure I will be able to go forward with it because I don't know how long LxLabs can survive under their dead weight.
|
That's what I'm worried about. Hopefully they just release the underlying source code and do the right thing. The lack of response has be deafening here, and I can no longer put any faith in LxLabs.
However, if a firewalled front-end to Kloxo/HyperVM can be built (heck, I'd certainly pay licensing fees for it), then it's still viable in its currently (sad) state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Virtual HyperVM Panel [message #71446 is a reply to message #67094] |
Mon, 12 October 2009 23:21   |
josh6025  Messages: 32 Registered: April 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Version 1.4 has a completely rewritten licensing system to increase security and decrease the loading time.
Update - Complete licensing system rewrite. The rewrite has decreased the loading time.
Bug - Suspended VPS' not being detected as suspended.
Update - Formatting changed when given the message "The VPS xxxx.vm doesn't belong to you."
New - Client area https detection added.
[Updated on: Mon, 12 October 2009 23:27] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|