|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stability, alternative control panel or donations? [message #91203 is a reply to message #91200] |
Fri, 18 November 2011 10:33   |
|
Personally, I don't see this as a lacking in donations or even hardware. There is just not a proper testing solution in place.
First would like to say: I would never use autoupdate on anything. I always test before updating if there is a possibility that a break would hurt me.
A true testing plan must be implemented.
A full list of checks must be listed.
If the checklist is complete enough, anyone should be able to use it.
Someone must certify the update. Possibly multiple people should certify it.
The best people to certify would be people that don't have their hands in the pot.
Finally a decision must be made on what really can and should be updated in 6.1.X. Personally I don't think "enhancements" should be added to 6.1.X. I see more harm than good in it. Also I don't think 6.2.X should be a direct upgrade path. This would allow more enhancements to be done without the worry of breaking 6.1.X.
https://www.mercuryvps.com
HyperVM Xen VPS hosting
|
|
|
|